Your browser doesn't support javascript.
Show: 20 | 50 | 100
Results 1 - 3 de 3
Filter
Add filters

Database
Language
Document Type
Year range
1.
British Journal of Haematology ; 197(SUPPL 1):172-173, 2022.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1861256

ABSTRACT

CPX-351 (Vyxeos® liposomal) is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine at a synergistic 1:5 molar drug ratio. Since 2018, NICE has recommended CPX-351 for the treatment of newly diagnosed, therapy-related AML (t-AML) and AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) based on results from a pivotal phase 3 trial of older adults. After 5 years of follow-up in the phase 3 trial, CPX-351 induction followed by consolidation improved median overall survival (OS) versus a 7+3 regimen of cytarabine and daunorubicin, with a comparable safety profile. Patients with AML in the United Kingdom have been treated in two key National Cancer Research Institute (NCRI) clinical trials (AML-18 and AML-19) that are exploring the role of CPX-351 outside of its licensed indications. Prospective interventional trials provide important clinical data but are often conducted in restricted populations that may not reflect the overall licensed population. Real-world analyses complement prospective trials by providing regional data on treatment outcomes and healthcare resource utilisation in everyday clinical practice, as well as by addressing data gaps, thus allowing clinicians to assess drug performance more fully. Additionally, with the approval of multiple novel agents for AML in the past few years and the complexities of treating AML during the COVID-19 pandemic, localised datasets that build on drug risk-benefit profiles are important for informing treatment decisions. Real-world outcomes of CPX-351 have recently been published for French, Italian and German cohorts, making this study (CREST) on treatment outcomes with CPX-351 in the United Kingdom essential from a national perspective. CREST ( C PX-351 R eal-world E ffectiveness and S afe t y Study;ClinicalTrials.gov NCT05169307) is a retrospective, non-interventional, multicentre, single-arm, observational study designed to collate efficacy and safety data for patients treated with CPX-351 according to its licensed dosage regimen in the United Kingdom. Data from approximately 150 patients treated since 2018 at 10 to 15 centres will be collected. Patients aged ≥18 years, diagnosed with t-AML or AML-MRC, and treated with ≥1 infusion of CPX-351 are eligible for the study. Patients previously treated in a clinical trial or who have received ≥1 induction treatment with another antineoplastic agent (except hydroxyurea) after their AML diagnosis will be excluded. The primary objectives of the study include assessment of remission rates (including measurable residual disease assessment) and OS. Secondary objectives include the collection of data related to patient characteristics, cytogenetic and molecular genetic features of AML, dosing schedule of CPX-351, potential prognostic factors for remission and OS outcomes, haematopoietic cell transplant rates and post-transplant outcomes, and safety. The study will also report on outpatient/ambulatory delivery of CPX-351, a shift away from conventional inpatient delivery of intensive chemotherapy, and its impact on cumulative resource utilisation. An exploratory analysis of the clinical presentation, management and outcomes of patients infected with COVID-19 who were treated with CPX-351 will also be included in the study. It is hoped the study will provide much-needed UK data to guide clinicians in the treatment of patients with t-AML or AML-MRC. Study sites are currently being recruited, with data collection expected through the first half of 2022..

2.
Blood ; 138:1248, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1582361

ABSTRACT

Introduction: Patients with therapy-related AML (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) are a known high-risk AML subgroup with historically poor outcomes. In December 2018, CPX-351 (Vyxeos ® Liposomal) received a positive reimbursement decision in England for the treatment of adults with newly diagnosed t-AML or AML-MRC. The objective of this retrospective study was to utilize the Cancer Analysis System (CAS) database available through the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) to describe the demographics, clinical characteristics, and treatment pathways for patients with t-AML or AML-MRC in England from 2013 to 2020, including the use of CPX-351. Methods: The NCRAS systematically collects and curates population-level data about cancer diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes across England. Adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with t-AML or AML-MRC between January 2013 and March 2020 were identified either directly using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition(ICD-O-3) codes or indirectly using non-specific ICD-O-2, ICD-O-3, or ICD-10 AML codes in combination with a record of prior systemic anticancer therapy or radiotherapy (t-AML) or a prior diagnosis of MDS or CMML (AML-MRC;other AML-MRC subtypes could not be distinguished from de novo AML). First-line and second-line treatments identified included clinical trials, intensive chemotherapy (IC) treatments (CPX-351;daunorubicin plus cytarabine [DA];fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor [FLAG-Ida];or “other IC” consisting of mitoxantrone-based therapy or high-dose cytarabine alone), or less-intensive therapies (azacitidine, low-dose cytarabine [LDAC], or hydroxycarbamide alone). Patients who did not receive active systemic therapy (ie, those who received best supportive care alone) were not included. Results: A total of 2,891 patients with t-AML or AML-MRC were identified. Most patients were male (62%), white (91%), and aged ≥60 years (80%). Overall, 590 (20%) patients received first-line treatment in a clinical trial, 1,474 (51%) received less-intensive therapy, and 827 (29%) received an IC regimen. Patients aged ≥60 years at diagnosis were less likely than those aged <60 years to either enter a clinical trial (18% vs 32%, respectively) or receive IC (22% vs 54%). In patients treated with IC, those who received CPX-351 were slightly older (mean [standard deviation] age: 63.9 years [8.3]) than those who received DA (60.5 years [11.4]) or FLAG-Ida (55.6 years [12.6]);28% of patients treated with CPX-351 were aged <60 years compared to 37% for DA and 55% for FLAG-Ida. When treatment patterns were analyzed per annum, utilization of less-intensive therapies remained stable over time (Figure 1A). Azacitidine was the most common less-intensive therapy both overall (64%) and across all yearly time points, followed overall by LDAC (22%) then hydroxycarbamide alone (14%). In contrast, the IC treatment patterns were more dynamic over time (Figure 1B). DA chemotherapy was the most common IC overall (48%), followed by FLAG-Ida (23%) and other ICs (18%). However, CPX-351 uptake started in 2018 (5% of all IC) and by the end of 2019 had displaced DA chemotherapy as standard-of-care IC (40% vs 22%, respectively). Excluding patients who were alive but had not received subsequent therapy (ie, censored), most patients who received front-line azacitidine or LDAC died without receiving salvage therapy (89% and 92%, respectively). In comparison, non-censored patients who received front-line DA chemotherapy or FLAG-Ida were more likely to receive salvage treatment (52% and 34%, respectively). Key salvage treatments following DA included azacitidine alone and FLAG-based therapy. Key salvage treatments following front-line CPX-351 included FLAG-Ida or DA ± hematopoietic cell transplant and azacitidine. Conclusions: This large population-level, retrospective analysis of CAS data provides a detailed overview of the management of patients with t-AML and AML-MRC. Historically a high proportion of these high-risk patients have received less-intensive treatment. Since 2018, CPX-351 has been rapidly adopted into the IC treatment pathway, displacing DA chemotherapy. These analyses will be repeated after the CAS database has been updated to determine the impact of COVID-19. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Legg: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Muzwidzwa: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Adamson: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Wilkes: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Medalla: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

3.
Blood ; 138:2310, 2021.
Article in English | EMBASE | ID: covidwho-1582351

ABSTRACT

Introduction: CPX-351 (US: Vyxeos ®;Europe: Vyxeos ® Liposomal) is a dual-drug liposomal encapsulation of daunorubicin and cytarabine in a synergistic 1:5 molar ratio. Since November 2018, the National Institute for Health and Care Excellence (NICE) has recommended its use for adults with newly diagnosed, therapy-related AML (t-AML) or AML with myelodysplasia-related changes (AML-MRC) due to either prior myelodysplastic syndrome (MDS)/chronic myelomonocytic leukemia (CMML) or de novo AML with myelodysplasia-related cytogenetic changes. The key aims of this study were to utilize the Cancer Analysis System (CAS) database available through the National Cancer Registration and Analysis Service (NCRAS) to describe the demographics and clinical characteristics of adults with AML in England who have received CPX-351, as well as to estimate overall survival (OS) and survival within stratifications of interest. Methods: The NCRAS systematically collects and curates population-level data about cancer diagnoses, treatments, and outcomes across England. Adults (aged ≥18 years) diagnosed with AML and treated with CPX-351 were included in this study. A diagnosis of t-AML or AML-MRC between January 2013 and March 2020 was determined either directly using International Classification of Diseases for Oncology, Third Edition (ICD-O-3) codes or indirectly using non-specific ICD-O-2, ICD-O-3, or ICD-10 AML codes in combination with either prior systemic anticancer therapy or radiotherapy (t-AML) or a prior diagnosis of MDS or CMML (AML-MRC;other AML-MRC subtypes could not be specifically identified and are included within the de novo AML subgroup). OS was measured from the date of diagnosis;a separate analysis of OS landmarked from the date of hematopoietic cell transplant (HCT) was also performed. Within this preliminary analysis, no OS adjustments have been made to account for any COVID-19-related deaths. Results: A total of 172 patients with AML who were treated with CPX-351 were identified: 37 (22%) had t-AML, 57 (33%) had AML-MRC, and 78 (45%) had de novo AML. At diagnosis, the mean (standard deviation) age was 62.8 years (10.1), with 49/172 (28%) patients aged <60 years;66% of patients were male;87% were white;and most had an Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status of 0 or 1 (68%). Six (3%) patients had received azacitidine treatment for a prior malignancy. To date, 43/172 (25%) patients had undergone HCT overall, including 43/97 (44%) patients with ≥3 months of follow-up. The cut-off date for OS was December 31, 2020, giving a median (interquartile range) follow-up of 11.2 months (3.6, 16.9). Overall, 91 patients had died, with an estimated median OS (95% confidence interval [CI]) of 16.6 months (11.0, not estimable) and probability of survival (95% CI) at 1 and 2 years of 0.54 (0.47, 0.62) and 0.39 (0.30, 0.50), respectively (Figure 1). Early mortality rates were 7% at 30 days and 15% at 60 days. When OS was landmarked from the date of HCT, median OS was not reached, with a probability of survival (95% CI) at 1 year of 0.74 (0.62, 0.89;Figure 2). When stratified by age, estimated median OS (95% CI) was not reached for patients aged <60 years and 12.8 months (8.9, 17.6) for patients aged ≥60 years. In a treatment patterns analysis that evaluated second-line treatments after CPX-351, 68 patients died without salvage therapy and 64 were alive without receiving subsequent therapy by the end of the study period. The most common salvage treatments were fludarabine, cytarabine, idarubicin, and granulocyte-colony stimulating factor (FLAG-Ida;n = 15), daunorubicin plus cytarabine (DA)-based therapy (n = 6), and azacitidine alone (n = 7). Of the 43 patients who received an HCT, 6 (14%) underwent HCT following salvage therapy. Conclusions: This is the largest study to date examining the real-world outcomes for patients with AML who were treated with CPX-351. The estimated median OS of 16.6 months is consistent with reported real-world outcomes for CPX-351 in French and Italian studies. Median OS has not been reached in patients aged <60 years or when landmarked from the date of HCT. Once the CAS database has been updated, these analyses will be repeated to increase follow-up and patient numbers and to determine the impact of COVID-19 on OS following CPX-351 treatment. [Formula presented] Disclosures: Legg: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company. Doubleday: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Reich: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Lambova: IQVIA Inc., which was contracted by Jazz Pharmaceuticals for the conduct of this analysis: Current Employment. Medalla: Jazz Pharmaceuticals: Current Employment, Current equity holder in publicly-traded company.

SELECTION OF CITATIONS
SEARCH DETAIL